<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>SPADE: Synthesizing Data Quality Assertions for Large Language Model Pipelines · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2401.03038/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2401.03038/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>SPADE: Synthesizing Data Quality Assertions for Large Language Model Pipelines — mentioned by sourabh03agr</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39105517</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2401.03038:39105517</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 16:27:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Operationalizing large language models (LLMs) is challenging, mainly due to their unpredictable behaviors and potentially catastrophic failures. A few of the essential requirements for productionizing LLM applications are evaluating them for a variety of checks as well as monitoring their performance in production. This process carries two major friction points: 1. Identifying which evaluations to run is tricky: LLM Prompts are growing in complexity. Prompts nowadays have 50+ instructions with many repetitions. SPADE, developed by researchers at UC Berkeley, HKUST, LangChain, and Columbia…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2401.03038/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DB</category></item><item><title>SPADE: Synthesizing Data Quality Assertions for Large Language Model Pipelines — mentioned by typpo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39044426</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2401.03038:39044426</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 17:14:52 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats on the launch! I&amp;#x27;ve been interested in automatic testset generation because I find that the chore of writing tests is one of the reasons people shy away from evals. Recently landed eval testset generation for promptfoo (https://github.com/typpo/promptfoo), but it is non-RAG so more simplistic than your implementation. Was also eyeballing this paper https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.03038, which outlines a method for generating asserts from prompt version history that may also be useful for these eval tools.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2401.03038/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DB</category></item></channel></rss>
