<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>StreamDiffusion: A Pipeline-level Solution for Real-time Interactive Generation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2312.12491/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2312.12491/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>StreamDiffusion: A Pipeline-level Solution for Real-time Interactive Generation — mentioned by Flux159</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38749460</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2312.12491:38749460</guid><pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2023 23:47:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Arxiv paper here https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.12491 I think that it&amp;#x27;s possible to get faster than their default timings for a 4090 (I have been able to get 10fps without optimizations with SDXL Turbo and 1 iteration step), but their other improvements like using a Stochastic Similarity Filter to prevent unnecessary generations are good for getting fast results w/out having to pin your GPU at 100% all the time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2312.12491/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
