<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Rich Human Feedback for Text-to-Image Generation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2312.10240/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:27:26 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2312.10240/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Rich Human Feedback for Text-to-Image Generation — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42656632</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2312.10240:42656632</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 15:47:29 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Show HN: We collected detailed annotations for text-to-image generation&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Recently, the most popular modality text-to-image annotations has been preference data, where annotators usually choose between two images two indicate their favorite. While this does work to fine-tune models, it lacks additional information about what might be wrong with the images. E.g., what part of the image is misaligned relative to the prompt. Google research propose a modality for more information rich annotations (https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10240). Based on this, we produced this dataset of ~13k images. We collected in total ~1.5 million annotations from 150k annotators using our…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2312.10240/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
