<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2312.08935/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2312.08935/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations — mentioned by dimitry12</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42475263</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2312.08935:42475263</guid><pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 21:32:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Verifier is trained with soft values of reward-to-go for each solution-prefix, obtained from monte-carlo rollouts of step-by-step solutions sampled from the &amp;quot;base&amp;quot; model. In other words: 1) sample step-by-step solutions from &amp;quot;base&amp;quot; model; 2) do it at non-zero temperature so that you can get multiple continuation from each solution-prefix; 3) use MATH-labels to decide if full solution (leaf/terminal node in MC rolloout) has reward `1` or `0`; 4) roll up these rewards to calculate reward-to-go for each intermediate step. Yes, verifier trained in this manner can be used to score…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2312.08935/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
