<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>AI-guided inverse design and discovery of recyclable vitrimeric polymers · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2312.03690/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2312.03690/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>AI-guided inverse design and discovery of recyclable vitrimeric polymers — mentioned by ben_w</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43659622</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2312.03690:43659622</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 23:02:40 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; With certain small antipersonnel drones excepted And mines, and the CIWS I linked to and several like it (I think SeaRAM is similar autonomy to engage), and the Samsung SGR-A1 whose autonomy led to people arguing that we really ought to keep humans in the loop: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lethal_autonomous_weapon The problem is, the more your adversaries automate, the more you need to automate to keep up. Right now we can even have the argument about the SGR-A1 because it&amp;#x27;s likely to target humans who operate at human speeds and therefore a human in the loop isn&amp;#x27;t a major risk to…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2312.03690/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.mtrl-sci</category></item></channel></rss>
