HackerPapers

arXiv:2312.02071cs.CC

Evaluating the Claims of "SAT Requires Exhaustive Search"

Michael C. Chavrimootoo, Yumeng He, Matan Kotler-Berkowitz, Harry Liuson, Zeyu Nie

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

In this paper, we take a closer look at the claims made by Xu and Zhou in their paper "SAT Requires Exhaustive Search" [XZ23], which claims to provide a lower bound on the complexity of the so-called Model RB. Xu and Zhou conclude that their result implies a separation between P and NP, since the lower bound purportedly proves that the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) is true. In examining Xu and Zhou's arguments, we find a flaw in their main theorems. The authors assume that an algorithm for Model RB must have a certain structure that can leverage downward self-reducibility, and argue that such an algorithm cannot run in polynomial time. We argue that this structure is not guaranteed to exist and thus their paper neither proves SETH to be true nor proves P $\neq$ NP.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CCComputational Complexity

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Mar 2024 to Mar 2024. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.