<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Continual Learning: Applications and the Road Forward · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.11908/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.11908/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Continual Learning: Applications and the Road Forward — mentioned by chriskanan</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43372137</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2311.11908:43372137</guid><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 12:36:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;As a leader in the field of continual learning, I somewhat agree, but I&amp;#x27;d say that catastrophic forgetting is largely resolved. The problem is that the continual learning community largely has become insular and is mostly focusing on toy problems that don&amp;#x27;t matter, where they will even avoid good solutions for nonsensical reasons. For example, reactivation / replay / rehearsal works well for mitigating catastrophic forgetting almost entirely, but a lot of the continual learning community mostly dislikes it because it is very effective. A lot of the work is focusing on toy problems and they…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.11908/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
