<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Portable, Efficient, and Practical Library-Level Choreographic Programming · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.11472/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.11472/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Portable, Efficient, and Practical Library-Level Choreographic Programming — mentioned by dplyukhin</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50059056</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2311.11472:50059056</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 16:44:19 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Curious how this compares to Rust&amp;#x27;s existing choreographic programming library, ChoRus [1]. Those of you asking for motivation might enjoy the accompanying paper [2], which is really well written. Lindsey Kuper&amp;#x27;s group has done a ton of great work popularizing choreographic programming as a DSL. You can get even more power if you integrate choreographic programming directly into the compiler - for an example of that you can see Choral, an extension of Java that I&amp;#x27;ve been contributing to for a few years [3]. [1]: https://github.com/lsd-ucsc/ChoRus [2]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.11472 [3]…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.11472/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.PL</category></item></channel></rss>
