<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Machine Culture · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.11388/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.11388/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Machine Culture — mentioned by omoikane</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39974975</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2311.11388:39974975</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 00:00:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Decision quality&amp;quot; appears to be average difference in winning probability between player&amp;#x27;s move versus a move by Alpha Go (Leela Zero). It&amp;#x27;s on page 16 of: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3893835 Where it says &amp;quot;Measuring the quality of moves&amp;quot;. I found this via citation #31 of: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.11388 Which was referenced by the second graph in the blog post (they link to Nature, but the paper at Arxiv appears to be the same).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.11388/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item><item><title>Machine Culture — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39136417</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2311.11388:39136417</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2024 22:38:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Machine Culture&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.11388/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item></channel></rss>
