HackerPapers

arXiv:2311.10069math.CO

The fractional chromatic number of the plane is at least 4

Máté Matolcsi, Imre Z. Ruzsa, Dániel Varga, Pál Zsámboki

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We prove that the fractional chromatic number $χ_f(\mathbb R^2)$ of the unit distance graph of the Euclidean plane is greater than or equal to $4$. Interestingly, however, we cannot present a finite subgraph $G$ of the plane such that $χ_f(G)\ge 4$. Instead, we utilize the concept of the geometric fractional chromatic number $χ_{gf}(G)$, which was introduced recently in connection with density bounds for 1-avoiding sets. First, as $G$ ranges over finite subgraphs of the plane, we establish that the supremum of $χ_f(G)$ is the same as that of $χ_{gf}(G)$. The proof exploits the amenability of the group of Euclidean transformations in dimension 2 and, as such, we do not know whether the analogous statement holds in higher dimensions. We then present a specific planar unit distance graph $G$ on 27 vertices such that $χ_{gf}(G)=4$, and conclude $χ_f(\mathbb R^2)\ge 4$ as a corollary. As another main result we show that the finitary fractional chromatic number and the Hall ratio of the plane are equal. As a consequence, we conclude that there exist finite unit distance graphs with independence ratio $\frac{1}{4}+\varepsilon$, while we conjecture that the value $\frac{1}{4}$ cannot be reached.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
math.COCombinatorics math.MGMetric Geometry

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 3 comments across 3 threads, from Apr 2024 to Jun 2026.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments3 threads

    • > You just know nothing about math and are happy to parrot bullshit AI salesmen are selling you. Not the parent poster here. I do know things about math. I wrote a few papers related to the unit distance problem (https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10069…

      skinner_View on HNParent context

  1. GPT-5 is behind schedule 1 comment
    • Sure, these are standard problems, I’ve said so myself. My point is that my productivity is multiplied by ChatGPT, even if it can only solve standard problems. This is because, although I work on highly non-standard problems (see https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10069 for an example)…

      skinner_View on HNParent context

  2. Erdos Problems Collection 1 comment
    • Very good question! Yes, the final value is somewhere in there. I expect that it's the lowest point, meaning Croft's Tortoise is optimal. Since then we have an unpublished new 0.241 upper bound with the same proof but wider computer search. We don't know what Erdős had in mind…

      skinner_View on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.