arXiv:2311.10069math.CO
The fractional chromatic number of the plane is at least 4
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
We prove that the fractional chromatic number $χ_f(\mathbb R^2)$ of the unit distance graph of the Euclidean plane is greater than or equal to $4$. Interestingly, however, we cannot present a finite subgraph $G$ of the plane such that $χ_f(G)\ge 4$. Instead, we utilize the concept of the geometric fractional chromatic number $χ_{gf}(G)$, which was introduced recently in connection with density bounds for 1-avoiding sets. First, as $G$ ranges over finite subgraphs of the plane, we establish that the supremum of $χ_f(G)$ is the same as that of $χ_{gf}(G)$. The proof exploits the amenability of the group of Euclidean transformations in dimension 2 and, as such, we do not know whether the analogous statement holds in higher dimensions. We then present a specific planar unit distance graph $G$ on 27 vertices such that $χ_{gf}(G)=4$, and conclude $χ_f(\mathbb R^2)\ge 4$ as a corollary. As another main result we show that the finitary fractional chromatic number and the Hall ratio of the plane are equal. As a consequence, we conclude that there exist finite unit distance graphs with independence ratio $\frac{1}{4}+\varepsilon$, while we conjecture that the value $\frac{1}{4}$ cannot be reached.
> You just know nothing about math and are happy to parrot bullshit AI salesmen are selling you. Not the parent poster here. I do know things about math. I wrote a few papers related to the unit distance problem (https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10069…
skinner_View on HNParent context