<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Turning Your Strength into Watermark: Watermarking Large Language Model via Knowledge Injection · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.09535/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.09535/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Turning Your Strength into Watermark: Watermarking Large Language Model via Knowledge Injection — mentioned by jruohonen</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38299506</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2311.09535:38299506</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 04:17:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I remain skeptical because it is easy enough to pass the output from a LLM through a filter, a scrubber, another LLM, or whatever. Furthermore, people (humans) typically alter the outputs as well. Here is another fresh paper on the same topic from Chinese researchers: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09535 While they discuss some attacks, they too do not consider altering the output from a LLM, possibly through f(g(h(...))).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.09535/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
