<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models via Multi-Agent Peer Review Collaboration · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.08152/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.08152/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models via Multi-Agent Peer Review Collaboration — mentioned by sansseriff</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46186127</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2311.08152:46186127</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2025 22:50:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;We have centuries of experience in managing potentially compromised &amp;#x27;agents&amp;#x27; to create successful societies. Except the agents were human, and I&amp;#x27;m referring to debates, tribunals, audits, independent review panels, democracy, etc. I&amp;#x27;m not saying the LLM hallucination problem is solved, I&amp;#x27;m just saying there&amp;#x27;s a wonderful myriad of ways to assemble pseudo-intelligent chatbots into systems where the trustworthiness of the system exceeds the trustworthiness of any individual actor inside of it. I&amp;#x27;m not an expert in the field but it appears the work is being done: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.08152…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.08152/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
