<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Gargantuan chaotic gravitational three-body systems II. Dependence on angular momentum and astrophysical scale · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.07651/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.07651/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Gargantuan chaotic gravitational three-body systems II. Dependence on angular momentum and astrophysical scale — mentioned by forgotpwd16</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39910980</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2311.07651:39910980</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 21:21:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;simulate all sorts of things... even entire universes You also assumed that chaos is a measurement problem. You could simulate entire universe if you knew the initial conditions sufficiently enough. There were two nice recent papers[1][2] that showed in order to predict some orbits you&amp;#x27;ll need an accuracy less of Planck length or else some systems are fundamentally unpredictable. [1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.04029 [2]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.07651&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.07651/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
