<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Language Models can be Logical Solvers · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.06158/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.06158/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Language Models can be Logical Solvers — mentioned by stevenhuang</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38317312</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2311.06158:38317312</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:20:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A hammer is a finished product. LLMs as a technology are in their infancy and see groundbreaking developments every month. There are models trained on character level tokens that handle precisely these issues. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.06158 https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/17xj8wl/trainin... The fact LLMs can&amp;#x27;t currently handle character-level changes tell us nothing about whether or not they truly understand meaning. The parent commentator is not probing the right things to answer his question.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.06158/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
