<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>ITRUSST Consensus on Biophysical Safety for Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.05359/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.05359/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>ITRUSST Consensus on Biophysical Safety for Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation — mentioned by yoble</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42083326</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2311.05359:42083326</guid><pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 01:52:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice timing, tomorrow I&amp;#x27;ll be participating in a study doing transcranial ultrasonic neuro-modulation, meaning using ultrasound not just to map brain activity but to influence it (the point of the study is inhibiting the Default Mode Network). If anyone&amp;#x27;s interested I found those two paper really interesting: - Aubry et al 2023[1], on potential risks and limitions of using focused ultrasound in the brain (tldr we don&amp;#x27;t know but have conservative estimates. Really interesting for me to see that HN article adding to that) - Lord et al 2024[2], a first study on using Transcranial Focused…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.05359/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.bio-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
