<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Everything of Thoughts: Defying the Law of Penrose Triangle for Thought Generation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.04254/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.04254/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Everything of Thoughts: Defying the Law of Penrose Triangle for Thought Generation — mentioned by CGamesPlay</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38391128</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2311.04254:38391128</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2023 09:52:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;While we&amp;#x27;re all wildly speculating about what Q* is and if GPT-5 will be able to do grade-school maths, I stumbled upon this interesting paper that discusses mixing classic RL algorithms (MCTS, like from AlphaGo), with LLMs. Q* is typically used to refer to the search for the optimal policy in these algorithms. Paper: &amp;quot;Everything of Thoughts: Defying the Law of Penrose Triangle for Thought Generation &amp;quot; - https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04254&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2311.04254/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
