<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Does GPT-4 pass the Turing test? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.20216/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.20216/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Does GPT-4 pass the Turing test? — mentioned by ben_w</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40634474</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2310.20216:40634474</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 15:10:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Does X look like Y&amp;quot; is always a continum. In test environments, players are judged human with these rates: * Real humans 66% * GPT-4: 49.7% * ELIZA: 22% * GPT-3.5: 20% https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.20216 (I&amp;#x27;m rather surprised by ELIZA beating 3.5, as were the researchers). Turing&amp;#x27;s introduction of the test, was a 70% chance of spotting the AI after 5 minutes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.20216/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>Does GPT-4 pass the Turing test? — mentioned by notahacker</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38901841</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2310.20216:38901841</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2024 15:14:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;GPT-4 achieved a success rate of 41 percent, second only to actual humans&amp;quot; also feels like a (much bigger) lie of omission looking at the original paper. GPT4&amp;#x27;s performance was in the range of 6% to 41%, Eliza&amp;#x27;s 27% score sat in the upper middle of that range, and considering the bots tested consisted of 8 GPT4 prompts, 2 GPT3.5 prompts and a naive script from the 1960s, GPT4 would have had to be remarkably consistently inhuman not to finish &amp;quot;second only to humans&amp;quot; with its highest scoring prompt The blog appears to have been updated to specify GPT3.5, but the original version was accurate.…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.20216/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>Does GPT-4 pass the Turing test? — mentioned by RandomLensman</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38831764</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2310.20216:38831764</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 13:52:17 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;LLMs don&amp;#x27;t pass the Turing so easily (https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.20216).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.20216/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>Does GPT-4 pass the Turing test? — mentioned by RandomLensman</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38506423</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2310.20216:38506423</guid><pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2023 11:56:24 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;GPT4 might not be great at the Turing test either, it seems (https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.20216 and that is the simple non-adverserial version of the test).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.20216/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>Does GPT-4 pass the Turing test? — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38424009</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2310.20216:38424009</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2023 19:04:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Does GPT-4 Pass the Turing Test?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;60 points; 88 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.20216/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>Does GPT-4 pass the Turing test? — mentioned by aidaman</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38317262</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2310.20216:38317262</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:13:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;not yet: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.20216 that being said, it is highly intelligent, capable of reasoning as well as a human, and passes IQ tests like GMAT and GRE at levels like the 97th percentile. most people who talk about Chat GPT don&amp;#x27;t even realize that GPT 4 exists and is orders of magnitude more intelligent than the free version.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.20216/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>Does GPT-4 pass the Turing test? — mentioned by piyh</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38279036</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2310.20216:38279036</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2023 17:00:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Not quite https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.20216&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.20216/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>Does GPT-4 pass the Turing test? — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38093289</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2310.20216:38093289</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2023 00:45:13 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Does GPT-4 Pass the Turing Test?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.20216/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
