<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>CodeFusion: A Pre-trained Diffusion Model for Code Generation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.17680/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.17680/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>CodeFusion: A Pre-trained Diffusion Model for Code Generation — mentioned by speedgoose</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39797982</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2310.17680:39797982</guid><pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2024 06:52:13 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;To be precise, ChatGPT 3.5 turbo being 20B is officially a mistake from a Microsoft Researcher, quoting a wrong source published before the release of chatgpt3.5 turbo. Up to you to believe it or not. But I wouldn’t claim it’s a 20B according to Microsoft Researchers. The withdrawn paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.17680 The wrong source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2023/02/17/is... The discussion: https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/17jrj82/new_mic...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.17680/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item><item><title>CodeFusion: A Pre-trained Diffusion Model for Code Generation — mentioned by nl</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38372638</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2310.17680:38372638</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 00:16:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The paper was https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.17680 It has been withdrawn with this note: &amp;gt; Contains inappropriately sourced conjecture of OpenAI&amp;#x27;s ChatGPT parameter count from this http URL, a citation which was omitted. The authors do not have direct knowledge or verification of this information, and relied solely on this article, which may lead to public confusion (the noted URL is a just a Forbes blogger with no special qualifications that would make what he claimed particularly credible).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.17680/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item><item><title>CodeFusion: A Pre-trained Diffusion Model for Code Generation — mentioned by airstrike</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38069862</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2310.17680:38069862</guid><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 14:27:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Also on HuggingFace: https://huggingface.co/papers/2310.17680 &amp;gt; We evaluate CodeFusion on the task of natural language to code generation for Bash, Python, and Microsoft Excel conditional formatting (CF) rules. Microsoft Excel conditional formatting, really? The future we want is one in which that abomination has died out, not one in which it is thriving.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.17680/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item><item><title>CodeFusion: A Pre-trained Diffusion Model for Code Generation — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38069786</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2310.17680:38069786</guid><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 14:21:33 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;CodeFusion: A Pre-Trained Diffusion Model for Code Generation&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6 points; 3 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.17680/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item><item><title>CodeFusion: A Pre-trained Diffusion Model for Code Generation — mentioned by Flux159</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38069230</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2310.17680:38069230</guid><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 13:29:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Link to the paper directly https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.17680.pdf The system that they describe, Codefusion is interesting because it&amp;#x27;s a diffusion model for generating code rather than an autoregressive model like most LLM code generators.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.17680/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item><item><title>CodeFusion: A Pre-trained Diffusion Model for Code Generation — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38068328</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2310.17680:38068328</guid><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 12:02:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft says GPT 3.5 has 20B parameters?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;57 points; 25 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.17680/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item></channel></rss>
