<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The M6 forecasting competition: Bridging the gap between forecasting and investment decisions · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.13357/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.13357/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The M6 forecasting competition: Bridging the gap between forecasting and investment decisions — mentioned by hcarlens</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39825573</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2310.13357:39825573</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:55:06 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;That was true in the first Makridakis competition (&amp;quot;M1&amp;quot;) in 1982, and possibly until M4 in 2018, but both M5 and M6 were won by what would generally be considered relatively sophisticated methods (e.g. LightGBM). The Wikipedia article doesn&amp;#x27;t have that much detail on M5 or M6, but the M5 papers are in the International Journal of Forecasting[1] and M6 should be published later this year (there&amp;#x27;s already a preprint on arxiv [2]). I recently spent some time looking into the history and results of the M competitions and had a chance to speak to Professor Makridakis about them, as well as the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.13357/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.AP</category></item></channel></rss>
