HackerPapers

arXiv:2310.07831cs.LG

Optimal Linear Decay Learning Rate Schedules and Further Refinements

Aaron Defazio, Ashok Cutkosky, Harsh Mehta, Konstantin Mishchenko

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Learning rate schedules used in practice bear little resemblance to those recommended by theory. We close much of this theory/practice gap, and as a consequence are able to derive new problem-adaptive learning rate schedules. Our main technical contribution is a refined analysis of learning rate schedules for a wide class of optimization algorithms (including SGD). When considering only worst-case analysis, our theory predicts that the optimal choice is the linear decay schedule where the step-size is set proportional to 1 - t/T, where t is the current iteration and T is the total number of steps. To go beyond this worst-case analysis, we use the observed gradient norms to derive schedules refined for any particular task. These refined schedules exhibit learning rate warm-up and rapid learning rate annealing near the end of training. Ours is the first systematic approach to automatically yield both of these properties. We perform the most comprehensive evaluation of learning rate schedules to date, evaluating across 10 diverse deep learning problems, a series of LLMs, and a suite of logistic regression problems. We validate that overall, the linear-decay schedule outperforms all commonly used default schedules including cosine annealing. Our adaptive schedule refinement method gives further improvements.

arXiv comments
An earlier preprint of this work appeared under the title When, Why and How Much? Adaptive Learning Rate Scheduling by Refinement
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning cs.AIArtificial Intelligence stat.MLMachine Learning (Statistics)

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Apr 2024 to Apr 2024.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • The behavior is actually more complex than a 1/t schedule. It behaves like a linear decay schedule 1-t/T with fixed stopping time T, as if T had been chosen in advance as the current timestep. When warmup is included, this is similar to high performance triangular learning rate…

      aarondefazioView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.