<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Latent Consistency Models: Synthesizing High-Resolution Images with Few-Step Inference · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.04378/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.04378/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Latent Consistency Models: Synthesizing High-Resolution Images with Few-Step Inference — mentioned by T-A</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38233283</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2310.04378:38233283</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2023 18:52:17 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;#x27;s quote the whole sentence, shall we? An LCM demands merely 32 A100 GPUs Hours training for 2-step inference, as de- picted in Figure 1. [1] Now let&amp;#x27;s look at the caption under Figure 1: LCMs can be distilled from any pre-trained Stable Diffusion (SD) in only 4,000 training steps (∼32 A100 GPU Hours) for generating high quality 768×768 resolution images in 2∼4 steps or even one step, significantly accelerating text-to-image generation. The training mentioned in your quote is distillation: it requires a previously trained SD model. You could have told just by reading the introduction: We…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.04378/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>Latent Consistency Models: Synthesizing High-Resolution Images with Few-Step Inference — mentioned by quadrature</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38225612</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2310.04378:38225612</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 22:48:29 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;from https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04378 it sounds like its a form of distillation of an SDL model. So im guessing it can&amp;#x27;t be directly trained, but once you have a trained diffusion model you can distil a predictor which cuts out the iterative steps. While it can do 1-step the output quality looks a ton better with additional steps.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.04378/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>Latent Consistency Models: Synthesizing High-Resolution Images with Few-Step Inference — mentioned by vipermu</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38223986</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2310.04378:38223986</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 20:19:46 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;it uses a new technique called &amp;quot;consistency&amp;quot; that lets latent diffusion models to predict images in much fewer steps. some links here: - https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04378 - https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.05556&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.04378/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
