<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Space-Efficient and Noise-Robust Quantum Factoring · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.00899/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.00899/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Space-Efficient and Noise-Robust Quantum Factoring — mentioned by sgt101</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40187560</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2310.00899:40187560</guid><pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2024 10:41:52 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;ve been going down this rabbit hole for a few weeks. Here is what I now think. Cai 2023 (https://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~jyc/Shor-Algorithm-with-Noise.pdf) showed that there is a definite noise floor for Shor&amp;#x27;s and gave a way to determine this. New algorithms are better than Shor&amp;#x27;s the in that they are smaller in space and time and more resilient to noise. The state of the art is Ragavan et-al https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.00899. The insight in Cai&amp;#x27;s about the QFT applies to this algorithm but is less damaging as is scales the noise floor at n^3/2 not n^2. It does seem that it is believed that…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.00899/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Space-Efficient and Noise-Robust Quantum Factoring — mentioned by japanuspus</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37985894</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2310.00899:37985894</guid><pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 14:10:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Quantum factoring may not be quite as far distant as you might think Most importantly, Shor is not the algorithm of choice for first-gen hardware where the central challenge is likely to be circuit depth due to error correction overhead. The current front-runner is a probably proposal by Regev [0] with a space-optimization by Ragavan et al. [1], which factors an n-bit integer with O(n log n) logical qubits and a circuit depth of O(n). What you should be looking for when studying quantum computing press releases is &amp;quot;fault tolerance&amp;quot;: A central problem in QC is that the underlying hardware…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2310.00899/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
