<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>From Complexity to Clarity: Analytical Expressions of Deep Neural Network Weights via Clifford's Geometric Algebra and Convexity · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.16512/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.16512/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>From Complexity to Clarity: Analytical Expressions of Deep Neural Network Weights via Clifford's Geometric Algebra and Convexity — mentioned by fc417fc802</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46554699</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2309.16512:46554699</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 15:10:58 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Note that I&amp;#x27;m not great at math so it&amp;#x27;s possible I&amp;#x27;ve entirely misunderstood you. Here&amp;#x27;s an example of directly leveraging a transform to optimize the training process. ( https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21265 ) And here are two examples that apply geometry to neural nets more generally. ( https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13018 ) ( https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.16512 )&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.16512/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>From Complexity to Clarity: Analytical Expressions of Deep Neural Network Weights via Clifford's Geometric Algebra and Convexity — mentioned by pizza</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46508282</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2309.16512:46508282</guid><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 03:05:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes to this. Furthermore: - you can solve neural networks in analytic form with a hodge star approach* [0] - if you use a picture to set your initial weights for your nn, you can see visually how close or far your choice of optimizer is actually moving the weights - eg non-dualized optimizers look like they barely change things whereas dualized Muon changes the weights much more to the point you cannot recognize the originals [1] *unfortunately, this is exponential in memory [0] M. Pilanci — From Complexity to Clarity: Analytical Expressions of Deep Neural Network Weights via Clifford&amp;#x27;s…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.16512/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
