<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Timeliness criticality in complex systems · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.15070/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.15070/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Timeliness criticality in complex systems — mentioned by vinnyvichy</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40734453</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2309.15070:40734453</guid><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 03:01:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Glad we moved the discussion into the Overton window of firmware. Maybe it&amp;#x27;s too early to start shipping metaphors in wetware, but developing general heuristics for productive+reproducible+survivable self-fuzzing? (*) &amp;quot;n X&amp;#x27;s&amp;quot; might still be a useful template to keep in mind, yes? Here are some good resources to explore the pain-gain frontier. (Or its baby versions, the supplies-surprise dilemma, shiprate quantification, etc.) [0-1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-024-02525-w https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.15070 [2] https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&amp;amp;page=0&amp;amp;prefix=true&amp;amp;que... [0] caveat…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.15070/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.soc-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
