<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>LEAP Hand: Low-Cost, Efficient, and Anthropomorphic Hand for Robot Learning · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.06440/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.06440/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>LEAP Hand: Low-Cost, Efficient, and Anthropomorphic Hand for Robot Learning — mentioned by claytonwramsey</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40253029</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2309.06440:40253029</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 22:22:27 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Your edit is roughly correct. It&amp;#x27;s a bit odd that they&amp;#x27;re comparing a single human-made policy with the very best of the DrEureka outputs; in practice, I would expect to make multiple different reward functions and then do validation on the functions and hyperparameters based on the resulting trained models. However, their comparison isn&amp;#x27;t necessarily wrong, since it seems (I could be wrong) that they used the reward function from prior papers in the field of policy learning. If you&amp;#x27;re interested in methods for actually learning policies for these sorts of dynamic motions, note that this…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.06440/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.RO</category></item></channel></rss>
