<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Provably safe systems: the only path to controllable AGI · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.01933/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.01933/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Provably safe systems: the only path to controllable AGI — mentioned by optimalsolver</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43265737</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2309.01933:43265737</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 12:37:27 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;AI can eventually create AI&amp;#x27;s that are built up out of robust and provable logic That&amp;#x27;s the approach behind Max Tegmark and Steven Omohundro&amp;#x27;s &amp;quot;Provably Safe AGI&amp;quot;: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01933 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhMwkk6uOK8 However, there are issues. How do you even begin to formalize concepts like human well-being?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.01933/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item><item><title>Provably safe systems: the only path to controllable AGI — mentioned by JoshTriplett</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40143372</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2309.01933:40143372</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 12:05:28 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; When Sam Altman is calling for AI regulation Sure; that&amp;#x27;s almost certainly not being done in good faith. When numerous AI experts and luminaries who left their jobs in AI are advocating for AI regulation, that&amp;#x27;s much more likely to be being done in good faith. &amp;gt; What is this regulation aimed at making AI safer https://pauseai.info/ &amp;gt; Furthermore, there doesn&amp;#x27;t seem to be any agreement on whether or how AI, at a state remotely similar to the level it is at today, is dangerous You could also write that as &amp;quot;there&amp;#x27;s no agreement that AI is safe&amp;quot;. But that aside... Most of the arguments about AI…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.01933/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item><item><title>Provably safe systems: the only path to controllable AGI — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37619285</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2309.01933:37619285</guid><pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 23:57:22 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Provably safe systems: the only path to controllable AGI&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;45 points; 64 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.01933/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item><item><title>Provably safe systems: the only path to controllable AGI — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37418110</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2309.01933:37418110</guid><pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2023 12:45:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Provably safe systems: the only path to controllable AGI&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.01933/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item></channel></rss>
