P-wave magnets — mentioned by godelski

Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:23:14 GMT

> In a paper that hasn’t yet been peer-reviewed, he and his colleagues predict the existence of yet another kind of magnetism, which he calls antialtermagnetism. Can we stop referring to ArXiv papers third way? And for the love of God, just link the fucking abstract, never NEVER link the html![0] You just change {html,pdf} -> abs We shouldn't say "not peer reviewed" because it isn't accurate. Being published in a journal doesn't mean a work is correct nor does it mean peers read it. Putting the paper on ArXiv does mean peers are reviewing it. The point of publishing is to communicate our work…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

P-wave magnets — HN submission

Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:20:23 GMT

Unconventional P-Wave Magnets

1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

P-wave magnets · HackerPapers discussions

P-wave magnets — mentioned by godelski

P-wave magnets — HN submission