<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.00267/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.00267/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback — mentioned by esseph</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49604978</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2309.00267:49604978</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 02:15:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Im assuming the people who _train_ AI [ LLMs ] actually need to separate the two, and avoid the feedback loop of training the next LLM on the output of the previous LLM. Check out Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF). Then skim some of this maybe: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.00267&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.00267/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback — mentioned by astrange</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40462377</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2309.00267:40462377</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 02:51:48 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The previous model does. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.00267 That&amp;#x27;s during fine-tuning though. I know I read one about applying it during pretraining, maybe this one? https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.08582&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.00267/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37378052</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2309.00267:37378052</guid><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 07:31:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Rlaif: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.00267/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
