HackerPapers

arXiv:2309.00196cs.CY

A Comparative Study of Reference Reliability in Multiple Language Editions of Wikipedia

Aitolkyn Baigutanova, Diego Saez-Trumper, Miriam Redi, Meeyoung Cha, Pablo Aragón

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Information presented in Wikipedia articles must be attributable to reliable published sources in the form of references. This study examines over 5 million Wikipedia articles to assess the reliability of references in multiple language editions. We quantify the cross-lingual patterns of the perennial sources list, a collection of reliability labels for web domains identified and collaboratively agreed upon by Wikipedia editors. We discover that some sources (or web domains) deemed untrustworthy in one language (i.e., English) continue to appear in articles in other languages. This trend is especially evident with sources tailored for smaller communities. Furthermore, non-authoritative sources found in the English version of a page tend to persist in other language versions of that page. We finally present a case study on the Chinese, Russian, and Swedish Wikipedias to demonstrate a discrepancy in reference reliability across cultures. Our finding highlights future challenges in coordinating global knowledge on source reliability.

arXiv comments
Conference on Information & Knowledge Management (CIKM '23)
Journal reference
DOI
doi:10.1145/3583780.3615254
Subjects
cs.CYComputers and Society

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Sep 2023 to Sep 2023. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.