<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Excel as a Turing-complete Functional Programming Environment · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.00115/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.00115/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Excel as a Turing-complete Functional Programming Environment — mentioned by sargstuff</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48334720</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2309.00115:48334720</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 10:32:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Obviously general purpose programming language(s) excluded[0]. -- per &amp;#x27;minimal&amp;#x27; Does usable / minimal mean no ecosystem / integrated development environment? No ecosystem/IDE would seem to exclude command line shell &amp;amp; unix &amp;#x27;one program does one thing well&amp;#x27;chaining/sourcing. &amp;#x27;Excel as a Turing-complete Functional Programming Environment&amp;#x27; would be excluded too![8]. Do at least need the ability to abstract/store &amp;amp; forward to get away from &amp;#x27;endless tape streams&amp;#x27;. (traditional grep vs. grep with &amp;#x27;state awareness&amp;#x27;) Would seem to some what depend on the domain of discourse. 1) Esoteric Programming…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.00115/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item></channel></rss>
