<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Detection of the Keplerian decline in the Milky Way rotation curve · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.00048/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.00048/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Detection of the Keplerian decline in the Milky Way rotation curve — mentioned by ccooffee</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37892852</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2309.00048:37892852</guid><pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2023 19:54:12 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The Arxiv[0] paper abstract seems much clearer and more informative than the linked article. In particular, it points to WHY the mass has been revised down so far -- there&amp;#x27;s seemingly a lot less mass at 19+ kiloparsecs (about 62,000 lightyears) from galactic center than we expected the galaxy to have. I&amp;#x27;m not an expert so it isn&amp;#x27;t clear to me if the discussions in the paper about dark-vs-baryonic matter are a theoretical explanation of the gap. Here&amp;#x27;s a 2019 article[1][1b] describing the mass of the galaxy at 1.5 trillion solar masses. This current research lowers that number to just 200…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2309.00048/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.GA</category></item></channel></rss>
