<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A Near-Cubic Lower Bound for 3-Query Locally Decodable Codes from Semirandom CSP Refutation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2308.15403/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2308.15403/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A Near-Cubic Lower Bound for 3-Query Locally Decodable Codes from Semirandom CSP Refutation — mentioned by foota</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38942587</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2308.15403:38942587</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 20:21:52 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I think there&amp;#x27;s a few areas of improvement. One is for yet better three query locally decodable codes (like I said, I think it&amp;#x27;s still not (sub)linear in space, which is likely a blocker for real use), another is for larger constants, and then as you note, for non-constant queries. My impression though is that the more interesting question is for larger constants (e.g., four query, etc.,). edit: interestingly, it looks like an earlier paper from overlapping authors proves a lower bound of k^3 (where k is the original message&amp;#x27;s length) for 3 query locally decodable codes…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2308.15403/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CC</category></item></channel></rss>
