<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Are ChatGPT and GPT-4 Good Poker Players? -- A Pre-Flop Analysis · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2308.12466/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2308.12466/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Are ChatGPT and GPT-4 Good Poker Players? -- A Pre-Flop Analysis — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37656429</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2308.12466:37656429</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 09:03:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Are ChatGPT and GPT-4 Good Poker Players? – A Pre-Flop Analysis&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2308.12466/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Are ChatGPT and GPT-4 Good Poker Players? -- A Pre-Flop Analysis — mentioned by famouswaffles</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37471573</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2308.12466:37471573</guid><pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 18:34:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;Unless you think that there is some fundamental reason why LLMs will never be able to play chess competently, and I doubt there is, then it seems that we could with the right prompts implement some sort of chess AI using an LLM. You can play a good game of chess (or poker for that matter) with GPT. https://twitter.com/kenshinsamurai9/status/16625105325852917... https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.12466 There&amp;#x27;s also some work going on in the eleuther ai discord training LLMs specifically for chess to see how they shape up. They&amp;#x27;re using the pythia models. so far: Pythia 70M, est ELO 1050 Pythia 160M…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2308.12466/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Are ChatGPT and GPT-4 Good Poker Players? -- A Pre-Flop Analysis — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37409091</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2308.12466:37409091</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 18:27:32 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Are ChatGPT and GPT-4 Good Poker Players? Yes but Not Game Theory Optimal&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2308.12466/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Are ChatGPT and GPT-4 Good Poker Players? -- A Pre-Flop Analysis — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37315357</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2308.12466:37315357</guid><pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2023 23:05:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Are ChatGPT and GPT-4 Good Poker Players? – A Pre-Flop Analysis&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2308.12466/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
