<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Diagnostic Reasoning Prompts Reveal the Potential for Large Language Model Interpretability in Medicine · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2308.06834/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2308.06834/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Diagnostic Reasoning Prompts Reveal the Potential for Large Language Model Interpretability in Medicine — mentioned by doctorpangloss</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38536003</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2308.06834:38536003</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 19:47:48 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;While this is very interesting, there are enough differences between astronomy and whatever papers this Twitter user is talking about that it&amp;#x27;s not the insight porn you think it is. The Twitter user doesn&amp;#x27;t even reference a single specific paper, kind of doing some hand wavy broad generalizations of his worst antagonists. So who really knows what he&amp;#x27;s talking about? I can&amp;#x27;t say. If he means papers like the ones in this search - https://arxiv.org/search/?query=step+by+step+gpt4&amp;amp;searchtype... - they&amp;#x27;re all kind of interesting, especially https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.06834 which is the kind of…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2308.06834/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
