Single crystal synthesis, structure, and magnetism of Pb$_{10-x}$Cu$_x$(PO$_4$)$_6$O — mentioned by ThePhysicist

Thu, 17 Aug 2023 07:03:39 GMT

No, this was just bad science from the beginning. I've done experimental physics research and the way this team published their results and how sloppy everything looked is definitely not how science should happen, it's just a great way to ruin your reputation as a scientist (which the original authors thoroughly did). Every PhD student learns to e.g. include proof that an observed effect is not caused by a different mechanism than the one claimed (i.e. ferromagnetism instead of superconductivity), this is sorely lacking from the original publication. That paper would never have made it…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Single crystal synthesis, structure, and magnetism of Pb$_{10-x}$Cu$_x$(PO$_4$)$_6$O — HN submission

Mon, 14 Aug 2023 07:16:35 GMT

Single crystal synthesis, structure, and magnetism of Pb₁₀₋ₓCuₓ(PO₄)₆O

2 points; 2 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Single crystal synthesis, structure, and magnetism of Pb$_{10-x}$Cu$_x$(PO$_4$)$_6$O · HackerPapers discussions

Single crystal synthesis, structure, and magnetism of Pb$_{10-x}$Cu$_x$(PO$_4$)$_6$O — mentioned by ThePhysicist

Single crystal synthesis, structure, and magnetism of Pb$_{10-x}$Cu$_x$(PO$_4$)$_6$O — HN submission