<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Pb$_9$Cu(PO4)$_6$(OH)$_2$: Phonon bands, Localized Flat Band Magnetism, Models, and Chemical Analysis · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2308.05143/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2308.05143/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Pb$_9$Cu(PO4)$_6$(OH)$_2$: Phonon bands, Localized Flat Band Magnetism, Models, and Chemical Analysis — mentioned by jamseason</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37725941</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2308.05143:37725941</guid><pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2023 13:51:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This article contains various unfounded statements. The manuscript that it refers to does not contain any calculations concerning superconducivity of the material, so it cannot say anything about it aside from vague guesses. There are no manuscripts I know on arXiv that contain calculations that suggest the material &amp;quot;should&amp;quot; be superconducting. This paper and several other discuss flat bands, but as noted in https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.05143 and elsewhere flat bands are no reason to expect superconductivity, especially the kinds that this material supports. So there is no theoretical support…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2308.05143/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.supr-con</category></item></channel></rss>
