First order transition in Pb$_{10-x}$Cu$_x$(PO$_4$)$_6$O ($0.9<x<1.1$) containing Cu$_2$S · HackerPapers discussionshttps://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2308.04353/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMTFirst order transition in Pb$_{10-x}$Cu$_x$(PO$_4$)$_6$O ($0.9<x<1.1$) containing Cu$_2$S — mentioned by MissingAFewhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37061391urn:hackerpapers:mention:2308.04353:37061391Wed, 09 Aug 2023 12:04:28 GMT<p>Or Beijing, since they apparently have fully replicated it. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.04353 I don&#x27;t know why so many institutions and scientists are so quick to call it nothing. It feels like hubris to me, the scientists in Korea spent many years on it, if it were so easy to dismiss I don&#x27;t think that would have continued their research... right?</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2308.04353/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cond-mat.supr-conFirst order transition in Pb$_{10-x}$Cu$_x$(PO$_4$)$_6$O ($0.9<x<1.1$) containing Cu$_2$S — HN submissionhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37058051urn:hackerpapers:submission:2308.04353:37058051Wed, 09 Aug 2023 02:28:21 GMT<p>First order transition in [LK-99] containing Cu2S</p><p></p><p>57 points; 13 discussion replies on HN. <a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2308.04353/">Paper and source history</a>. A submission is not an endorsement.</p>cond-mat.supr-con