GPT-4 Can't Reason · HackerPapers discussions

GPT-4 Can't Reason — mentioned by armitron

Fri, 12 Jul 2024 14:37:41 GMT

The "GPT-4 Can't Reason" paper [1] [2] is excellent and proves without a shadow of a doubt that there is no reasoning taking place. It also raises strong doubts about the efficacy and reliability of multi-agent approaches that rely on LLM-based planning (such as Cradle [3], which is currently on the front page). When it was previously discussed here, it received a torrent of low-quality comments that can only be described as confirmation bias: commenters tried the examples verbatim (instead of introducing random perturbations to get around model updates) in order to disprove the thesis. It's…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

GPT-4 Can't Reason — mentioned by samatman

Wed, 06 Mar 2024 19:31:24 GMT

False. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.03762

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

GPT-4 Can't Reason — mentioned by cscurmudgeon

Sat, 18 Nov 2023 03:42:16 GMT

Sorry. Robust research says no. Remember, people thought Eliza was AGI too. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.03762 If it was really AGI, there won't even be ambiguity and room for comments like mine.

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.