HackerPapers

arXiv:2308.02935cs.CY

Bias Behind the Wheel: Fairness Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems

Xinyue Li, Zhenpeng Chen, Jie M. Zhang, Federica Sarro, Ying Zhang, Xuanzhe Liu

Abstract

This paper conducts fairness testing of automated pedestrian detection, a crucial but under-explored issue in autonomous driving systems. We evaluate eight state-of-the-art deep learning-based pedestrian detectors across demographic groups on large-scale real-world datasets. To enable thorough fairness testing, we provide extensive annotations for the datasets, resulting in 8,311 images with 16,070 gender labels, 20,115 age labels, and 3,513 skin tone labels. Our findings reveal significant fairness issues, particularly related to age. The proportion of undetected children is 20.14% higher compared to adults. Furthermore, we explore how various driving scenarios affect the fairness of pedestrian detectors. We find that pedestrian detectors demonstrate significant gender biases during night time, potentially exacerbating the prevalent societal issue of female safety concerns during nighttime out. Moreover, we observe that pedestrian detectors can demonstrate both enhanced fairness and superior performance under specific driving conditions, which challenges the fairness-performance trade-off theory widely acknowledged in the fairness literature. We publicly release the code, data, and results to support future research on fairness in autonomous driving.

arXiv comments
Accepted by ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM)
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CYComputers and Society cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.CVComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition cs.SESoftware Engineering

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 1 thread, from Aug 2023 to Aug 2023.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • they're testing 8 different detection algorithms > The detection systems were 19.67% more likely to detect adults than children, and 7.52% more likely to detect people with lighter skin tones than people with darker skin tones, according to the study. while they all had a harder…

      LewtonView on HNParent context

    • The abstract sounds a bit different than the (rage baiting) article >bias towards dark-skin pedestrians increases significantly under scenarios of low contrast and low brightness https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.02935.pdf

      haunterView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.