HackerPapers

arXiv:2308.02712astro-ph.IM

A Search for Technosignatures Around 11,680 Stars with the Green Bank Telescope at 1.15-1.73 GHz

Jean-Luc Margot, Megan G. Li, Pavlo Pinchuk, Nathan Myhrvold, Larry Lesyna, Lea E. Alcantara, Megan T. Andrakin, Jeth Arunseangroj, Damien S. Baclet, Madison H. Belk, Zerxes R. Bhadha, Nicholas W. Brandis, Robert E. Carey, Harrison P. Cassar, Sai S. Chava, Calvin Chen, James Chen, Kellen T. Cheng, Alessia Cimbri, Benjamin Cloutier, Jordan A. Combitsis, Kelly L. Couvrette, Brandon P. Coy, Kyle W. Davis, Antoine F. Delcayre, Michelle R. Du, Sarah E. Feil, Danning Fu, Travis J. Gilmore, Emery Grahill-Bland, Laura M. Iglesias, Zoe Juneau, Anthony G. Karapetian, George Karfakis, Christopher T. Lambert, Eric A. Lazbin, Jian H. Li, Zhuofu, Li, Nicholas M. Liskij, Anthony V. Lopilato, Darren J. Lu, Detao Ma, Vedant Mathur, Mary H. Minasyan, Maxwell K. Muller, Mark T. Nasielski, Janice T. Nguyen, Lorraine M. Nicholson, Samantha Niemoeller, Divij Ohri, Atharva U. Padhye, Supreethi V. Penmetcha, Yugantar Prakash, Xinyi, Qi, Liam Rindt, Vedant Sahu, Joshua A. Scally, Zefyr Scott, Trevor J. Seddon, Lara-Lynn V. Shohet, Anchal Sinha, Anthony E. Sinigiani, Jiuxu Song, Spencer M. Stice, Andria Uplisashvili, Krishna Vanga, Amaury G. Vazquez, George Vetushko, Valeria Villa, Maria Vincent, Ian J. Waasdorp, Ian B. Wagaman, Amanda Wang, Jade C. Wight, Ella Wong, Natsuko Yamaguchi, Zijin Zhang, Junyang Zhao, Ryan S. Lynch

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We conducted a search for narrowband radio signals over four observing sessions in 2020-2023 with the L-band receiver (1.15-1.73 GHz) of the 100 m diameter Green Bank Telescope. We pointed the telescope in the directions of 62 TESS Objects of Interest, capturing radio emissions from a total of ~11,680 stars and planetary systems in the ~9 arcminute beam of the telescope. All detections were either automatically rejected or visually inspected and confirmed to be of anthropogenic nature. In this work, we also quantified the end-to-end efficiency of radio SETI pipelines with a signal injection and recovery analysis. The UCLA SETI pipeline recovers 94.0% of the injected signals over the usable frequency range of the receiver and 98.7% of the injections when regions of dense RFI are excluded. In another pipeline that uses incoherent sums of 51 consecutive spectra, the recovery rate is ~15 times smaller at ~6%. The pipeline efficiency affects calculations of transmitter prevalence and SETI search volume. Accordingly, we developed an improved Drake Figure of Merit and a formalism to place upper limits on transmitter prevalence that take the pipeline efficiency and transmitter duty cycle into account. Based on our observations, we can state at the 95% confidence level that fewer than 6.6% of stars within 100 pc host a transmitter that is detectable in our search (EIRP > 1e13 W). For stars within 20,000 ly, the fraction of stars with detectable transmitters (EIRP > 5e16 W) is at most 3e-4. Finally, we showed that the UCLA SETI pipeline natively detects the signals detected with AI techniques by Ma et al. (2023).

arXiv comments
21 pages, 9 figures, in press at AJ
Journal reference
AJ 166 206 (2023)
DOI
doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acfda4
Subjects
astro-ph.IMInstrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics astro-ph.EPEarth and Planetary Astrophysics

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Aug 2023 to Aug 2023. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.