Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning — mentioned by Betelbuddy

Sat, 17 Oct 2026 13:35:36 GMT

>> Being able to see the CoT Dont assume that is how your model decides... https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.04388 https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.13702 https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08679

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning — mentioned by activatedgeek

Tue, 15 Aug 2023 17:57:14 GMT

Thanks for the reference, Lakshya. Looks very cool! (Just thinking out loud next) If you allow me to be a little imprecise, guided-generation is prompting "just-in-time" unlike the other kind of prompting where you provide all reference tokens "ahead-of-time". Now there's work [1] out there that shows that smaller models rely much more on prompting than larger models do, i.e. smaller models are more faithful to the tokens in the prompt than the larger models which just do whatever they were going to do anyways. Your results seem very much in line with this kind of a qualitative result --- you…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning · HackerPapers discussions

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning — mentioned by Betelbuddy

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning — mentioned by activatedgeek