<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>An Empirical Study &amp; Evaluation of Modern CAPTCHAs · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2307.12108/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2307.12108/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>An Empirical Study &amp; Evaluation of Modern CAPTCHAs — mentioned by seanhunter</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39619107</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2307.12108:39619107</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 18:21:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is interesting to me. On the one hand &amp;quot;Proof of humanity&amp;quot; is an important problem and is surely only going to get more important as time passes. Bots are already better than humans at solving captchas.[1] On the other hand I cannot conceive of giving someone my biometric data so they can mint some blockchain thing from it, and although I admit I wasn&amp;#x27;t interested enough to look into it beyond reading a couple of articles, I really don&amp;#x27;t see how this specific solution makes the situation better. Eg how do they know someone hasn&amp;#x27;t pwned me and then hijacked my special proof of humanity…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2307.12108/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>An Empirical Study &amp; Evaluation of Modern CAPTCHAs — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38670465</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2307.12108:38670465</guid><pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2023 05:10:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;An Empirical Study and Evaluation of Modern CAPTCHAs&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;362 points; 329 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2307.12108/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>An Empirical Study &amp; Evaluation of Modern CAPTCHAs — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38333420</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2307.12108:38333420</guid><pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2023 15:20:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;An Empirical Study and Evaluation of Modern CAPTCHAs&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2307.12108/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>An Empirical Study &amp; Evaluation of Modern CAPTCHAs — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37233579</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2307.12108:37233579</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2023 09:21:07 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;An Empirical Study and Evaluation of Modern CAPTCHAs&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2307.12108/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>An Empirical Study &amp; Evaluation of Modern CAPTCHAs — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37198551</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2307.12108:37198551</guid><pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2023 12:42:12 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Empirical Study and Evaluation of Modern CAPTCHAs&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2307.12108/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>An Empirical Study &amp; Evaluation of Modern CAPTCHAs — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37164389</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2307.12108:37164389</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 16:40:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;An Empirical Study and Evaluation of Modern CAPTCHAs&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2307.12108/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>An Empirical Study &amp; Evaluation of Modern CAPTCHAs — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37157512</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2307.12108:37157512</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 05:12:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;An Empirical Study and Evaluation of Modern CAPTCHAs&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2307.12108/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>An Empirical Study &amp; Evaluation of Modern CAPTCHAs — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37133679</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2307.12108:37133679</guid><pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2023 13:22:24 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;An Empirical Study and Evaluation of Modern CAPTCHAs&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2307.12108/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
