<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Testing the Quantum of Entropy · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2307.09914/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2307.09914/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Testing the Quantum of Entropy — mentioned by amluto</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37199779</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2307.09914:37199779</guid><pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2023 14:57:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;(5) (the minimum value of entropy) seems to come from an extremely hand-wavy argument on page 5 here: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.09914 It appears to be an example of argument by italics. I’m not convinced that it has any real content — it seems to be trying to say that the author thinks all systems are either being observed or they aren’t, and that there are therefore at least two microstates. I think this is entirely missing the point and is mostly wrong. Even in the highly classical case of a gas, you have a box full of gas, with n particles and some volume V, etc. Those parameters form the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2307.09914/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
