ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development · HackerPapers discussions

ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development — mentioned by PhilippGille

Tue, 20 May 2025 20:30:48 GMT

This has been proposed/exlored in 2023 already: ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development - https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07924

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development — HN submission

Tue, 31 Oct 2023 21:00:02 GMT

Communicative Agents for Software Development

2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development — mentioned by famouswaffles

Wed, 18 Oct 2023 18:52:08 GMT

>The ChatGPT "AI" isn't an autonomous thinker performing its own actions based on reasoning of what's fed to it. Yes it is. Or it very well could be. Agency is trivial to implement in LLMs. https://github.com/microsoft/autogen https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07924 The intelligence and tool access of the LLM in question is the only thing stopping things from being particularly dangerous (to humanity).

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development — mentioned by famouswaffles

Wed, 18 Oct 2023 13:39:38 GMT

https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07924 at the very least, you can get things done that would be extremely difficult or practically impossible to do with a single instance.

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development — mentioned by falcor84

Mon, 09 Oct 2023 19:37:05 GMT

Not to discount your experience, I would just like to flag that your conclusion does not quite follow from the premises. I don't believe that there's anything inherent about LLMs that would make one incapable of recognizing the falsity of an argument made by another LLM. Rather it's just the they're not all powerful, and struggle with complex tasks when they don't have any way of directly checking their code's outputs (or error messages), same as humans. There is a lot of recent progress in collaboration between LLMs when they're given the ability to run their code and assess their progress…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development — mentioned by loveparade

Fri, 06 Oct 2023 11:33:09 GMT

I mean, it's just a clickbait video. The research paper [0] is cool and all, I just wish we didn't have these hyperbolic clickbait titles like "OpenAI’s ChatGPT Makes A Game For $1!" - we really are in a bubble. [0] https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07924

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development — HN submission

Fri, 06 Oct 2023 02:13:18 GMT

Communicative Agents for Software Development

2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development — HN submission

Wed, 13 Sep 2023 22:40:25 GMT

Communicative Agents for Software Development [PDF]

1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development — mentioned by kmote00

Tue, 12 Sep 2023 15:36:56 GMT

Original paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.07924v3.pdf

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development — mentioned by famouswaffles

Tue, 05 Sep 2023 15:47:35 GMT

AI taking to AI to do things is not necessarily an exercise in futility. This paper used 3.5, not even 4 and is basically a couple AI agents collaborating to create software. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07924 This is another example at multi AI agent collaboration. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.02485 Getting relevant intelligent text to arbitrary previous text means generating text capable of making decisions. That is the end game here. Your machine can think for you now.

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development — mentioned by famouswaffles

Thu, 10 Aug 2023 20:43:59 GMT

It's more than just a react loop but i think there's promising research in multi gent cooperation. Notice the first doesn't even use GPT-4. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07924 https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.02485

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development — mentioned by famouswaffles

Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:27:21 GMT

>The lack of effectiveness and usefulness of these agents has been shown time and over. Has it ? https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07924 https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.02485 The first one doesn't even use GPT-4

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development — mentioned by famouswaffles

Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:25:22 GMT

Papers that try to implement a multi agent system https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07924 https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.02485

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development — HN submission

Mon, 31 Jul 2023 14:56:51 GMT

Communicative LLM Agents for Software Development

1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.