https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2307.04297/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36800208urn:hackerpapers:mention:2307.04297:36800208Thu, 20 Jul 2023 13:33:57 GMT<p>I suggest changing the title to something more relevant, like the title of the preprint [https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.04297], maybe: &quot;AT 2023clx: the Faintest and Closest Optical Tidal Disruption Event Discovered&quot; As an aside, I&#x27;m saddened to again realise phys.org is pretty bad at reporting, like look at this: &gt; Using mainly the Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope network (LCOGT) and NASA&#x27;s Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, they conducted follow-up observations of AT 2023clx—a transient source initially identified in 2014. That aside is just completely wrong: as indicated explicitly in the…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2307.04297/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>astro-ph.HE