<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Frontier AI Regulation: Managing Emerging Risks to Public Safety · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2307.03718/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2307.03718/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Frontier AI Regulation: Managing Emerging Risks to Public Safety — mentioned by SpicyLemonZest</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49684470</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2307.03718:49684470</guid><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 14:36:05 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;In early 2019 OpenAI released a post titled &amp;quot;Better language models and their implications&amp;quot; (https://openai.com/index/better-language-models/). In this post, they explained that their new GPT-2 model shows broad capabilities across a wide range of tasks, why this should be worrying to the public and to policymakers, and how this led to their decision not to release it widely. In particular, they said: * This kind of decision is similar to the norms in biotechnology and cybersecurity, where AI misuse may soon become relevant. * They understand that some people have the technical capacity to…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2307.03718/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item><item><title>Frontier AI Regulation: Managing Emerging Risks to Public Safety — mentioned by dragonwriter</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38376283</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2307.03718:38376283</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 07:55:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Why can&amp;#x27;t these safety advocates just say what they are afraid of? They have. At length. E.g., https://ai100.stanford.edu/gathering-strength-gathering-stor... https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.03718.pdf https://eber.uek.krakow.pl/index.php/eber/article/view/2113 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/102425892211472... https://jc.gatspress.com/pdf/existential_risk_and_powerseeki... For just a handful of examples from the vast literature published in this area.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2307.03718/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item></channel></rss>
