<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Fast classical simulation of evidence for the utility of quantum computing before fault tolerance · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2306.16372/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2306.16372/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Fast classical simulation of evidence for the utility of quantum computing before fault tolerance — mentioned by deepburner</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36578386</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2306.16372:36578386</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 20:32:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Quantum Computing/Information researcher here. This article is largely garbage, the original (~2 month old) paper is surprisingly readable [0] and I suggest you to check it out. Here&amp;#x27;s my $0.02: The efforts of the Google team is commendable in that they&amp;#x27;re trying to squeeze as much out of their noisy systems as possible until error correction is here (they need to, to justify their existence after all) and they are aware of the shortcomings of the paradigm. But personally I don&amp;#x27;t see anything useful coming out until error correction and number of qubits are improved many orders of magnitude…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2306.16372/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
