<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravitational wave signals · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2306.16214/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2306.16214/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravitational wave signals — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36516697</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2306.16214:36516697</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2023 05:33:11 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Huh, this turned into a wee-hours rant. Sorry. I hope the extra information in it makes up for that. The Ars article focused on the NANOGrav raft of papers; NANOGrav is just one of the several pulsar timing array collaborations that are in this synchronized un-embargoing of papers. There is substantial overlap between, say, the NANOGrav papers in the Ars Technica article and the joint InPTA/EPTA set which includes https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16225 https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16214 and https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16226 but also enough non-overlap to encourage reading all of them (and to refresh…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2306.16214/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.HE</category></item></channel></rss>
