<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Identity Construction in a Misogynist Incels Forum · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2306.15745/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2306.15745/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Identity Construction in a Misogynist Incels Forum — mentioned by I_Am_Nous</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37772058</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2306.15745:37772058</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 21:28:21 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;this is why you call them having a common interest as an ideology but would not present a community of soccer enthusiasts the same way. You keep trying to hammer this point when the fruit of what comes out of a community matters when discussing what that community believes. However, instead of belaboring this further I&amp;#x27;ll just point to something[1] that carries more weight than my anonymous words, where they discuss the incel ideology because it actually exists: &amp;quot;Across our quantitative analysis of the distribution and associations made with identity terms, we see evidence of an ideology…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2306.15745/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
