<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Efficient tensor network simulation of IBM's Eagle kicked Ising experiment · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2306.14887/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2306.14887/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Efficient tensor network simulation of IBM's Eagle kicked Ising experiment — mentioned by pathOf_aFineMan</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47612318</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2306.14887:47612318</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 10:07:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;there&amp;#x27;s still a long road to commercial applications but today&amp;#x27;s hardware is simulating quantum systems beyond the scale of classical methods, for example [1]; an interesting line of work opposite to this can be found in those who improve classical methods towards such examples [2], but these are only developed because of the existing quantum hardware Really though, today&amp;#x27;s IBM hardware is good fun to play with, eg for generating moderately large GHZ states [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26845 [2]https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.14887&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2306.14887/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Efficient tensor network simulation of IBM's Eagle kicked Ising experiment — mentioned by deepburner</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36578386</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2306.14887:36578386</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 20:32:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Quantum Computing/Information researcher here. This article is largely garbage, the original (~2 month old) paper is surprisingly readable [0] and I suggest you to check it out. Here&amp;#x27;s my $0.02: The efforts of the Google team is commendable in that they&amp;#x27;re trying to squeeze as much out of their noisy systems as possible until error correction is here (they need to, to justify their existence after all) and they are aware of the shortcomings of the paradigm. But personally I don&amp;#x27;t see anything useful coming out until error correction and number of qubits are improved many orders of magnitude…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2306.14887/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
